Cash For Clunkers- Will We Save Anything?
Wednesday, August 5th, 2009
Cash for clunker was launched by Federal government on July 27 to give a rebate of up to $4500 by trading in your old gas guzzler car.
Let us find out if we will actually save money by this or is it a another political stunt?
Gas Saving:
For that $1 billion, Americans will trade in roughly 250,000 cars and light trucks. The average gas mileage of those “clunkers” (vehicles such as aging Ford Explorers) was 16 miles per gallon, according to data released Aug. 5 by the Transportation Dept. The average mileage of the replacement vehicles (led by Ford’s small Focus) is 25 mpg.
Now let us do a simple math. Let’s assume that the average number of miles driven for both the new and old vehicles is 12,000 miles per year. The clunker thus would have burned 750 gallons per year. The new car? Only 480 gallons. That’s a savings of 270 gallons per year per car. With gas at $3 per gallon, they’ll save $810 per year, assuming they drive the same number of miles (which actually is a questionable assumption).
And at 250,000 cars traded in so far, that adds up to 67 million fewer gallons consumed in the U.S. per year and with a saving of $201 million! This number may look very big. However, last year Americans burned over 138 billion gallons of gas. Therefore, cutting down the consumption by 67 million gallons is a drop in the ocean or may be a small step in the right direction.
In terms of the average fuel economy of the entire fleet, the Cash for Clunkers program is hardly even measurable. With 254 million registered vehicles in the U.S., the fact that 250,000 new cars are more efficient is a mere blip. “We’re talking about a tiny amount of cars,” says Lee Schipper, project scientist in Global Metropolitan Studies at the University of California at Berkeley, who studies fuel economy issues.
Carbon Dioxide Emission:
“As a carbon dioxide policy, this is a terribly wasteful thing to do,” said Henry Jacoby, a professor of management and co-director of the Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change at MIT. “The amount of carbon you are saving per federal expenditure is very, very small.”
Calculations by The Associated Press, using Department of Transportation figures, show that replacing those fuel hogs will reduce carbon dioxide emissions by just under 700,000 tons a year. While that may sound impressive, it’s nothing compared to what the U.S. spewed last year: nearly 6.4 billion tons (and that was down from previous years).
So overall this program will benefit only a few Americans and may save few million gallon of gas, with no major impact to population at large.


















